Franchising and licencing question
Compare and contrast the two Franchise Agreements, Taste of Philly and Haagen Dazs, with respect to the contractual termination provisions.
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper NowRespond to each question using the number below, and post your answer as a separate paragraph in one initial post.
1. Under what specific circumstances could the Franchisor terminate the agreement after the franchise is operating based on the Taste of Philly Agreement? Cite the contract location(s)
2.Under what specific circumstances could the Franchisor terminate the agreement after the franchise is operating based on the Haagen Dazs agreement? Cite the contract location(s)
3.In general, not related to these two contracts, Why would a Franchisor not have a specific process and framework for terminating a Franchise? Is this a strategy or an oversight? Defend your position.
4.List 3 more specific reasons why a Franchise should be terminated and why you believe these to be true. You may not use reasons cited in the agreements above.
Reference Choices
Taste of Philly. (2012, February 6). Franchise Agreement. Retrieved November 6, 2018, from https://www.tasteofphilly.biz/wp-content/uploads/TasteOfPhillySampleFranchiseAgreement.pdf
The HAAGEN-DAZS Shoppe Company, INC. (2007, March 26). Franchise Offering Circular. Retrieved November 6, 2018, from http://www.freefranchisedocs.com/haagen-dazs-UFOC….
